<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laziness pays in functional languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rogersm.net/2008/11/laziness-pays-in-functional-languages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rogersm.net/2008/11/laziness-pays-in-functional-languages</link>
	<description>exploring area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogersm</title>
		<link>http://rogersm.net/2008/11/laziness-pays-in-functional-languages/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>rogersm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersm.net/?p=29#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Outside the non-functional programming mindset is an established myth:&lt;br/&gt;
from &lt;a href=&quot;http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2007-May/438576.html&quot; title=&quot;last paragraph&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;python mailing lists&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2273#comment-33706&quot; title=&quot;another code&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lambda, the ultimate&lt;/a&gt; the &lt;i&gt;problems&lt;/i&gt; of delayed evaluation are all around.
Even the paper notes the usefulness of lazy evaluation over strict evaluation and tries to dispel this myth:
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.26.5166&quot;&gt;It is worth noting that the discussed technique makes essential use of laziness and can be regarded as a practical example of the usefulness of lazy evaluation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outside the non-functional programming mindset is an established myth:<br />
from <a href="http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2007-May/438576.html" title="last paragraph" rel="nofollow">python mailing lists</a> to <a href="http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2273#comment-33706" title="another code" rel="nofollow">Lambda, the ultimate</a> the <i>problems</i> of delayed evaluation are all around.<br />
Even the paper notes the usefulness of lazy evaluation over strict evaluation and tries to dispel this myth:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.26.5166"><p>It is worth noting that the discussed technique makes essential use of laziness and can be regarded as a practical example of the usefulness of lazy evaluation.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lee Smith</title>
		<link>http://rogersm.net/2008/11/laziness-pays-in-functional-languages/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lee Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rogersm.net/?p=29#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Is this really an established myth or did you just make it up? I&#039;ve been involved in a lot of discussions regarding functional programming and the &quot;lazy evaluation doesn&#039;t pay&quot; argument hasn&#039;t been mentioned once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this really an established myth or did you just make it up? I&#8217;ve been involved in a lot of discussions regarding functional programming and the &#8220;lazy evaluation doesn&#8217;t pay&#8221; argument hasn&#8217;t been mentioned once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.205 seconds -->

